Mathematik online lernen im Mathe-Forum. Nachhilfe online
Startseite » Forum » suppose that the cost of producing r radios is ...

suppose that the cost of producing r radios is ...

Schüler

Tags: Mathematik

 
Antworten Neue Frage stellen Im Forum suchen
Neue Frage
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

00:18 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten

Hi,dear friends and tutors . I need your help with this problem. I have attached an inmage of the problem.

I know that my independent variable is the number of radios r and that I am looking for the rate of change of the cost c (with respect to r) so
I know the average rate of change formula.

f(b)-f(a)b-a

From this I can derive this as I am looking for the rate of change of the cost c (with respect to r).
c(r2)-c(r1)(r2-r1)

but I am stuck here. I don't know wht the values of r2 and r1 should be
I thought that as they give intervals in the multiple choice, eg, between 20 and 25 radios
I could assign values r2=25r1=20

c(25)-c(20)25-20 radios)

but I 'm confused because when I simplify that it gives me 1
and if I do the same thing with the other intervals it also amounts to 1

I need your direction here ,please.
thanks in advance


Für alle, die mir helfen möchten (automatisch von OnlineMathe generiert):
"Ich möchte die Lösung in Zusammenarbeit mit anderen erstellen."
Online-Nachhilfe in Mathematik
Neue Frage
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

00:22 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
the image did not attach. let me try again.

rsz_20230125_122847
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

01:58 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
Hello,

in general your approach is right. But somehow you misinterpret the formula. For the interval [20,25] the corresponding term is

300+1525-0.3252-(300+1520-0.3202)25-20=1.5


Hint: The average change in the interval [60,65] is -22.5.


greetings
pivot
Frage beantwortet
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

02:19 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
thanks a lot, my good friend. Ich wünsche Dir das Beste!.
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

02:22 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
You're welcome. Thank you. I wish the same for you.
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

02:30 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
I did the same calculation that you did, the same way for interval [60,65] and got 97.5 as a result.
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

02:32 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
(300+15(65)-0.3(65)2-300+15(60)-0.3(20)2)(65-60)
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

02:32 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
(300+15(65)-0.3(65)2-300+15(60)-0.3(20)2)(65-60)
Frage beantwortet
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

02:57 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
Oh, sorry, I made a mistake and instead of 60 wrote 202 in the numerator. that is why I got that. Ignore it.
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

03:10 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
I rectified the mistake and still don't get what you get. I get -94.5. can you pls tell me if you can see were I go wrong?.Thanks, pivot.
Antwort
walbus

walbus aktiv_icon

04:36 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
Would you please put the picture into the right position and, if possible, enlarge it!
It takes big effort to read it.
It is very little apart from that, very unpleasant to help you if the data are that
difficult to read.
Mind that next time, please!
I beg for your understanding.
Some don't react, because they are not willing to read exercises presented in such a way.
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

06:11 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
@Rasta

You've forgotten the brackets around the whole expression you subtract. I use square brackets to highlight it.

ΔyΔx=300+1565-0.3652-[300+1560-0.3602]65-60

The term on the LHS denotes the difference quotient.

Then remember: If you have a negative sign in front of a bracket and you then remove the brackets, the signs are exchanging. That means, that -(a-b+c)=-a+b-c, for instance.

Remark: If you use a calculator the brackets must not be removed.
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

17:51 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten

I rectified that part about the signs for interval [60-65] Thanks.

300+15(65)-0.3652-[300+1560-0.3602]

I distributed the negative sign like you advised.

so,
left hand side of the numerator produced 7.5
right side produced -120
divided by 65-60
-112.55

interval [60,65]=-22.5

for interval [5,10] the average rate of change of cost was= 10.5

and for interval [30,35] the average rate of change of cost= -22.5

for interval [20,25] the average rate of change of cost= 1.5

so interval [5,10] has the greatest average rate of change of cost to produce a radio.

RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

17:54 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
Yes, you're right,walbus. I will keep it in mind for next time. Sometimes it is a challenge to get the webpage to accept a certain dimension for an image. But next time it will be better. thanks a lot.
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

18:34 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
The rates are right, except for the interval [30,35]
Frage beantwortet
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

18:56 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
thanks,
let's see about that.
((300+1535-0.3352-(300+1530-0.3302)))35-30


-4.5
Corrected.
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

19:07 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
That's right.

Now we have to interpret "the greatest average rate of change".
In my option it is -22.5. Sure it is negative. But a negative change is a change as well, only in the opposite direction. The cost decrease on average by 22.5 per unit in the interval [30,35]
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

19:08 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
DoppelpoSt.
RASTA

RASTA aktiv_icon

19:23 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
I was going to ask you that. Thanks. so it is a change anyways. The cost changed for the better. the cost of producing a radio went down so it is negative. thanks a lot
Antwort
pivot

pivot aktiv_icon

21:53 Uhr, 26.01.2023

Antworten
>>I was going to ask you that.<<
Good idea.

You're welcome.
Finally set a check mark. Thanks.
Diese Frage wurde automatisch geschlossen, da der Fragesteller kein Interesse mehr an der Frage gezeigt hat.